If It Ain’t Broke,
Don’t Fix It
Being a child of the ‘70s, I am, of course, a Star Wars fan.
I remember exactly where I was when I first heard about Star Wars, and watching
the movie for the fourteenth time the other day was like reliving my childhood
all over again. Glorious! Of course, like all good Star Wars enthusiasts, I was
appalled by the three “prequels”, and somewhat dreaded the last three movies in
the sequence. My son, following along well in his father’s footsteps, became a
Star Wars junkie as well. So, we saw the most recent three movies together. He
was a fan; and, as much to be contrarian as anything, I complained about the movies.
Specifically, “They are just like the originals! Same plotline! Same action!”
And, Jason’s response? “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!” Sure enough, the same
formula worked great, so why change it?
So, millennia after our first parents, Adam and Eve, were
tempted by Satan, it should come as no surprise that he uses the exact same tactics
against us today. Why, I suppose, not because he lacks the creativity in his approach
and evil; but, why bother to do it differently? If the same, good ol’ tried and
true method works so very, very well, might as well keep it up!
2 Corinthians 2:11 encourages us “not to be outwitted by
Satan, for we are not ignorant of his schemes.” But, that’s just it. I fear
that we truly are ignorant of his
schemes. Not, mind you, that we are ignorant of him and the fact that he is. That is a concern for some more
“modern, educated” Christians who would doubt Satan’s very existence, but that
is not my present worry. No, my primary concern here is that we are ignorant of
the way temptation comes upon us, ignorant of the very means that brings such
grief into our lives.
I suspect that, because temptation is so subtle; that
because it strikes each of us so individually; that because we imagine that our
temptations, if not unique, are nonetheless so very personal, I suspect that we
think that the manner in which temptation comes is distinctive to each one of
us. Because that which tempts me is not likely to attract you, because what
lures you from the Lord is different than what entices me, we might think that
there is no standard approach to Satan’s attack. And consider: sometimes
temptation comes in a package that we know, we know, we should avoid—something where the lure to sin is so obvious
and so clearly damaging to our walk with the Lord that we know we should stand
strong in resistance. On the other hand, as we’ve been addressing the past
couple of weeks, sometimes temptation is not so evil-looking at all; sometimes
it is downright good—though still something that would reorient us away from
our relationship with Christ. So, given the variety of temptations and the many
different individuals who are tempted, can we really say there is a pattern to
it all?
Well, a comparison of the two major temptation scenes, one
which opens the Old Testament (Genesis 3) and the other that begins the New
Testament (Matthew 4), shows an astonishing commonality in the way temptation
functions. The serpent’s discussion with Eve is remarkably similar to Satan’s
approach with Jesus. The Tempter’s goal in the garden is nearly identical with
his goal with Jesus in the desert. The steps along the way, the manner in which
he takes the conversation, the promise and hopes he holds out to both Eve and
Jesus look so alike. It’s almost like Satan is using the exact same tricks… and
why shouldn’t he? They work!
So, what is the process of temptation? Can we really talk
about a certain pattern that temptation follows in our lives? And, if there is
a common approach to entice us to sin, is there a common defense that we all
might cleave to? This Sunday we’ll be asking these very questions—I hope you’ll
join us!
Read Genesis 3:1-7 and Matthew 4:1-11.
1. What common elements are present in both situations? What
is different in each?
2. Notice how Satan approaches both Eve and Jesus with questions.
What is distinctive about that? Where might that same approach be used with
you?
3. Obviously, Eve and Jesus respond to the Tempter
differently. Where do their experiences begin to differ so that they end up
with different responses?
4. What is the role of God’s Word in both temptations (Note:
for Eve it would not have been written Scripture, but God’s speech)?
5. Satan is known as the Tempter but also as the Deceiver.
Where do you see deception prominent in the two passages?
6. What does Satan offer to Jesus? How is that offer similar
to the one he makes to Eve? How might that give you insight into how you are
tempted?
7. Think of the temptations King David went through or
Abraham desiring a child or Abraham traveling in Egypt with his wife or Joseph
in Egypt or Achan in Jericho or… any of the other temptation scenarios we see
in Scripture. What is similar with their experiences with temptation and what
Eve and Jesus went through?