Thursday, July 26, 2012

A Portrait of Grace

Julian Tchividjian is not a household name. He is, however, the pastor of a well-known church - Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church. It is the church that God led D. James Kennedy to start some fifty years ago. A few years ago Tchividjian wrote the book, Jesus + Nothing = Everything. It’s a book about grace. Of all the doctrines of the Christian faith, grace is the least understood; and yet, it’s the most foundational. In commenting on another work on grace, Tchividjian says, “…the gospel of grace is way more drastic, way more offensive, way more liberating, way more shocking, and way more counterintuitive than any of us realize. At its deepest level there is nothing more radically unbalanced and drastically unsafe than grace. It has no “but”; it’s unconditional, uncontrollable, unpredictable, and undomesticated. It unsettles everything.”

Indeed, more than sixty years ago in commenting on Paul’s letter to the Romans, chapter 5, where Paul asks, “Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?” D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones says:
First of all, let me make a comment, to me a very important and vital comment. The true preaching of the gospel of salvation by grace alone always leads to the possibility of this charge being brought against it. There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of grace. If my preaching and presentation of the gospel of salvation does not expose it to that misunderstanding, then it is not the gospel. Let me show you what I mean.
If a man preaches justification by works, no one would ever raise this question. If a man’s preaching is, ‘If you want to be Christians, and if you want to go to heaven, you must stop committing sins, you must take up good works, and if you do so regularly and constantly, and do not fail to keep on at it, you will make yourselves Christians, you will reconcile yourselves to God and you will go to heaven’. Obviously a man who preaches in that strain would never be liable to this misunderstanding. Nobody would say to such a man, ‘Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?’, because the man’s whole emphasis is just this, that if you go on sinning you are certain to be damned, and only if you stop sinning can you save yourselves. So that misunderstanding could never arise . . .
Nobody has ever brought this charge against the Church of Rome, but it was brought frequently against Martin Luther; indeed that was precisely what the Church of Rome said about the preaching of Martin Luther. They said, ‘This man who was a priest has changed the doctrine in order to justify his own marriage and his own lust’, and so on. ‘This man’, they said, ‘is an antinomian; and that is heresy.’ That is the very charge they brought against him. It was also brought George Whitfield two hundred years ago. It is the charge that formal dead Christianity – if there is such a thing – has always brought against this startling, staggering message, that God ‘justifies the ungodly’ . . .
That is my comment and it is a very important comment for preachers. I would say to all preachers: If your preaching of salvation has not been misunderstood in that way, then you had better examine your sermons again, and you had better make sure that you are really preaching the salvation that is offered in the New Testament to the ungodly, the sinner, to those who are dead in trespasses and sins, to those who are enemies of God. There is this kind of dangerous element about the true presentation of the doctrine of salvation.

This week the message is entitled “A Portrait of Grace.” Our guest preacher will base his message on Zechariah 3 and Ephesians 2:1-10. In preparation for Sunday’s message you may wish to consider the following:

1. What is the problem that the Zechariah 3 vision addresses?
2. Who is it who pleads the cause of God’s people?
3. How does Romans 8:33-34 relate?
4. Note the parallel between Zechariah 3 and the Book of Jude. Also, Romans 11:1.
5. How does Joshua, the Levitical High Priest, represent every one of the children of God? (Note v. 3.)
6. What is God’s answer? (Note v. 4.)
7. How is this a perfect picture of what Christ has done for us?
8. What is the difference between Paul’s articulations of the Gospel in Ephesians 2:1-10 and most contemporary Christians’ view?
9. How do vs. 1-3 of Ephesians 2 parallel what the prophet Zechariah says in verse 3?
10. What does it mean to see yourself as the “workmanship of God”?

See you Sunday!