Thursday, February 5, 2015

"Joy in Imitation" - Doug Rehberg

It was January 3, 2007 at a quarter to one in the afternoon when Wesley Autrey took the hands of his two young daughters and walked down the steps of a Harlem subway station.  They were headed 95 blocks south to Times Square where his daughters would rendezvous with their mother, and Autrey would continue on to the construction site where he worked.  But, as he reached the platform, he and two women standing nearby noticed a 20-year-old film academy student named Cameron Hollopeter, having a seizure.  Within seconds, he was on the platform convulsing.  Autrey shouted for a pen.  As soon as he got it he opened the man’s mouth and put the pen inside to keep the man from swallowing his tongue.  Within a minute or two the young man opened his eyes, stood to his feet, and began to wobble.  He tried to walk, but soon he was stumbling backwards toward the edge of the platform, and then down onto the tracks.  Autrey says, “At first I thought I could jump down and lift him back to safety, but when I saw the lights of the train I knew there wasn’t time for that.”  So, he made another decision.  He leapt down to where the fallen man was.  He rolled him into the trench between the tracks and lay on top of him.  As the man began to struggle, Autrey wrapped his arms around him, locked him down and said to him, “Excuse me sir, I’m just trying to save your life.  I’ve got two little girls up there that want to see their daddy again.  So would you just relax?”

The driver of the train had seen all of this happening, but he couldn’t stop.  He blew his whistle.  He stomped on the brakes, but he couldn’t stop the train.  Five cars ran right over Autrey’s head before it stopped.  He said when the train came to a stop all he could hear were the screams of the onlookers.  So, he shouted at the top of his lungs, “We’re ok down here, but I’ve got two little girls up there that need to know their daddy’s alive.”  Suddenly screams turned to cheers.  The power was cut.  The cars were moved manually, and Cameron Hollopeter, the 20-year-old film student, was taken to St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital in New York.  But Autrey refused medical attention saying, “There’s nothing wrong with me that a little laundry detergent can’t fix.”  You see, the depth of the trench was 22”.  Cameron and Wesley were at 21 ½”.  The only thing Autrey suffered was some grease on the top of his blue knit cap.
Now what would possess a man to lay down his life for a stranger like that?  According to Paul, it’s a different kind of mind, it’s the mind of Christ. 

If you were with us last week you know that Paul is addressing a conflict that exists in the Philippian Church.  Though the Christians at Philippi are arguably the most well-adjusted collection of Christians Paul encounters in his church planting, they nevertheless have conflicts.  We see Paul referring to that at the end of chapter one.
But in chapter two, verse 3, he expands his discussion by citing the basic pattern and motive of the human mind.  He says, “Do nothing from ‘selfish ambition’ eritheia or “conceit” kenadoxia (empty glory).  And last week we detailed both the pattern or methodology and the motive that the natural human mind always employs.  Elsewhere Paul calls this “the mind of the flesh”.  But that’s not the only mind Paul details.  In Philippians 2:5-11 Paul sets forth the elements of the mind of Christ.  He says in verse 5, “Have this mind among yourselves that is yours in Christ Jesus.”  So what is the nature of this mind?  How does the mind of Christ differ from the natural human mind?  For an answer to these questions, and more, we turn to our text this Sunday – Philippians 2:5-11.

As mentioned last week, this text is among the highest points of all Scripture.  The Christology (the study of Christ) that is on display here is breathtaking.  Anyone who struggles knowing who Christ is and what He’s done need only pause at these seven verses to see a full detailed description.  As one commentator has famously said, “To comment on these words is a high and holy privilege that no one should take lightly.  If the Bible were a mountain range, this text would be among its one or two highest peaks.”
So, in preparation for Sunday you may wish to consider the following:

1.      What do scholars have to say about Philippians 2:5-11?  Is it original with Paul?

2.      In Proverbs 3:5 we read about leaning on our own understanding.  How is that different than trusting on the Lord’s understanding?

3.      What does Paul mean in verse 6 when he says that Christ was “in the form of God”?

4.      How does the word “form” compare to the word form in verse 7?

5.      What is the relationship between the “conceit” of verse 3 and the emptying of verse 7?

6.      How are verses 7 and 8 the essence of the Gospel?

7.      Why does God exalt Jesus, bestowing on Him a name that is above every name?  (see verse 9)

8.      How is it that a Christian can choose to operate by his/her human mind or the mind of Christ?  Do pagans have such a choice?  Why or why not?

9.      How is humility the antidote to every conflict, internal or external?

10.  How is true glory a gift to be celebrated rather than a thing to be grasped?  And how does it breed love?
See you Sunday!